Comments on: Scott Peterson's Family Still Living In Denial

By: A Voice of Sanity

A Voice of Sanity — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:54:00 +0000

I know it. Laci’s underwear alone proves it. So does every other piece of evidence. Even the apparent ‘coincidence’ that his wife and son’s bodies were found where he was testing his boat, 4 MONTHS BEFORE, proves he is innocent, not guilty.

By: Chris Jones

Chris Jones — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:49:00 +0000

I do fault them. It’s not ok to stand by your son when he butchers his wife and unborn child. To continue proclaiming his innocence and continue operating a website to look for “real killers” is sick. His parents need to get a grip on reality and accept their son is a monster.

By: matthew C

matthew C — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:55:00 +0000

I can’t fault Scott’s family for supporting him. I mean, if you can’t rely on your own family, whom can you rely on? So we should not be condemning them for standing by him and saying he’s innocent.

I will say, however, that “voice of sanity” is not a good spokesperson for Scott’s innocence, as he/she comes off as profoundly arrogant and condescending; “everyone is stupid but me” is the motto apparently. I agree that the case was circumstantial, for sure. What I can’t get over, however, is the fact that Scott tells Amber that this will be his first Christmas spent as a widower, and then, lo and behold, Laci disappears on Christmas Eve. That would have to be one hell of a coincidence. Am I stupid to feel that way “voice of sanity?”

By: Msuzmoore

Msuzmoore — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000

The fact that Scott took Laci and Conners life is unbelivable but his family and friends that are in denial that he did this have no life either. look at all the people who’s been affected by him murdering his wife and child.

By: Chris Jones

Chris Jones — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:50:00 +0000

I know. The Peterson family paid big shot attorney Mark Geragos more than $1 million to defend Scott and he ended up on death row. It was a circumstantial case and no cause of death was ever determined. But the jury used common sense. Too bad the Anthony jury didn’t have a little of that.

By: panda

panda — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:19:00 +0000

he should’ve talked to casey anthonys lawyer

By: Luv_muzic3000@hotmail.com

Luv_muzic3000@hotmail.com — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 04:38:00 +0000

Scott Peterson is scum of the earth! You sit here defending him when he killed his wife and unborn child! He deservers way worse than the death penalty! Scott Peterson is guilty as he was proven now get that through your brains!

By: lillielue

lillielue — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:32:00 +0000

Do you still believe he is innocent? I am not judging just asking.

By: A Voice of Sanity

A Voice of Sanity — Wed, 05 May 2010 00:48:01 +0000

Dyan ranted: “I found this and read these entertaining blogs here…. UHM….? I think th earticle is more about Scott’s ridiculous parents and how they SPOILED that kid rotten.”

His parents are perfectly fine and they raised a fine son. They didn’t spoil him at all.

More rubbish: “I don’t think there really is much of a question – the man killed his wife and child. Its already been deemed proven in a Court of Law.”

Which ‘proves’ nothing since all the jury has proven is their appalling prejudice and stupidity. The actual evidence proves him innocent, something you are clearly too dim to grasp.

By: Dyan

Dyan — Tue, 04 May 2010 21:37:49 +0000

I found this and read these entertaining blogs here…. UHM….? I think th earticle is more about Scott’s ridiculous parents and how they SPOILED that kid rotten. If a REAL journalist wanted to make a great fortune they would write a book on how The Peterson’s created a spoiled little monster – whom they continue to facilitate.

I don’t think there really is much of a question – the man killed his wife and child. Its already been deemed proven in a Court of Law…. Maybe one day the selfish monster will find God in prison and will confess, but don’t hold your breathe, he loves himself too much – and doesn’t love his parents AT ALL. Their pain and anguish trying to prove his innocense is of no consequence to him.

Argueing his innocense or guilt is mute and not what this article is about – its about his rotten parents.