Rachel Maddow Is Terrible — So Stop Saying She's Good

by Chris Jones on December 29, 2008 · 14 comments

rachel maddow 221x300 Rachel Maddow Is Terrible    So Stop Saying She's Good

Ever since Rachel Maddow’s awful show debuted on MSNBC (The Obama Network) liberal journalists can’t stop writing puff pieces and making reference to it. Rachel Maddow is nothing more than a slightly less abrasive version of Keith Olbermann.

Just because she doesn’t say things with the same faux outrage as Olbermann doesn’t make her some kind of ground breaking pioneer. Having someone at NBC who actually cared about facts and honest reporting would be ground breaking — but I’m not gonna hold my breath.

Rachel Maddow is a radical left-winger who is only adored by liberals because she’s a butch lesbian who hates Bush (what an accomplishment).

Share |

DO YOU LIKE THIS STORY?

  • Pingback: thehotjoints

  • Exotic Electron

    So you slut on the name recognition for 2 columns of ads.

  • Lil’ old Conservative me…

    I think both Ms Maddow and Mr Olbermann are ‘crushing’ on Glen Beck–why else would they mention his name so many times on the MSNBC Comedy Network.

    • Marti

      Because Beck is an idiot!!

      • poop

        And a nut job haha

  • Paul Teeling

    Perhaps when you use a photograph for your blog. You should get permission from the photographer. You do not have permission to use my photograph, which, by the way, you or someone else cropped badly. Remove my photograph from your blog, or pay me for the usage rights.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/realchrisjones realchrisjones

      Seriously, is that really your photograph? I didn't crop or edit it in any way, but to be honest the post was from so long ago that I don't remember where I got it.

  • Jay

    Rachel is soooooooo cute. I bet Chris Jones doesn't look that good. lol

    • Marti

      Chris Jones probably isn't intellectually capable of understanding Rachel Maddow, hence the "dissing". He should look into furthering his education before criticizing and evaluating the knowledge of Rachel and Keith….2 of the most informed people on ANY channel!! …..'Nuf said?

      • Marti

        How come? What happened to "free speech"…..

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/realchrisjones realchrisjones

        Are kidding me? You actually think it requires some type of intellectual heft to understand Rachel and Keith? They're a joke. They have a tiny audience and very little influence on anything or anyone.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/realchrisjones realchrisjones

      She's definitely a better looking dude than me.

  • JSHous

     Watching Rachel….Go easy on Jon Huntsman.  He’s the most reasonable of Repubs.  As a blue voter who had lived in UT -a very red state- for ten years he was a surprisingly moderate Gov for all the reasons explained on your 20 May 2011 show.  Huntsman ought to wait till 2016 to gain further national name recognition AND wait til he won’t be running against an incumbent.  After eight years of Obama the country will be ready for a change, and he’ll have a much better chance…Let the Repubs put up a Goldwater or  Dole type sure-to-lose candidate against BHO in 2012…and then concentrate on 2016.  That’s where Huntsman could win.  If we have to have a Republican, Progressives, he’d be the most palitable. Just my spin….  JH, Tampa, FL

  • Trsh10

    the truth just rub some people the wrong way.

Web Analytics