<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>The Hot Joints &#187; gawker</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thehotjoints.com/tag/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thehotjoints.com</link> <description>Conservative news and opinion</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <!-- google_ad_section_end --><!-- google_ad_section_start --> <item><title>Judge Sides With Palin, Orders Gawker To Remove Leaked Excerpts</title><link>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2010/11/20/judge-sides-with-palin-orders-gawker-to-remove-leaked-excerpts/</link> <comments>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2010/11/20/judge-sides-with-palin-orders-gawker-to-remove-leaked-excerpts/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Books]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[america by heart]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotjoints.com/2010/11/20/judge-sides-with-palin-orders-gawker-to-remove-leaked-excerpts/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last week portions of Sarah Palin’s new book were leaked to Gawker.com. They of course used the out-of-context excerpts to trash Palin and the book. Sarah said she thought what Gawker did was illegal and said so via Twitter. Her publisher, Harper Collins, agreed and filed a lawsuit. Today a federal judge sided with Palin/Harper [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Last week portions of Sarah Palin’s <a href="http://astore.amazon.com/hotjoints-20/detail/0062064703" target="_blank">new book</a> were leaked to <a href="http://gawker.com/" target="_blank">Gawker.com</a>. They of course used the out-of-context excerpts to trash Palin and the book. Sarah said she thought what Gawker did was illegal and said so via Twitter. Her publisher, Harper Collins, agreed and filed a lawsuit.</p><p>Today a federal judge sided with Palin/Harper Collins and ordered Gawker to <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45447.html" target="_blank">remove</a> the leaked excerpts.</p><p>Saturday’s ruling is particularly amusing in light of the morons over at Gawker who <a href="http://www.therightscoop.com/sarah-palin-wins-judge-orders-gawker-to-remove-leaked-excerpts-of-her-new-book" target="_blank">taunted Palin</a> via Twitter after she complained about the leaks.</p><blockquote><p>Gawker later taunted Palin in a post titled, “Sarah Palin Is Mad at Us for Leaking Pages From Her Book”.</p><p>“Did you catch the excerpt we posted yesterday from Sarah Palin’s new book? Sarah did. She tweets with rage: ‘The publishing world is LEAKING out-of-context excerpts of my book w/out my permission? Isn’t that illegal?’ [Sarah: If you're reading this — and if you are, welcome! — you may want to take a moment to familiarize yourself with the law … ].”</p></blockquote><p>It looks like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Denton" target="_blank">Nick Denton</a> and his merry band of leftist shitheads are the ones who need to break out the law books.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2010/11/20/judge-sides-with-palin-orders-gawker-to-remove-leaked-excerpts/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Gawker Pretends To Be Relevant By Ambushing O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Ambusher</title><link>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2009/06/23/gawker-pretends-to-be-relevant-by-ambushing-oreillys-ambusher/</link> <comments>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2009/06/23/gawker-pretends-to-be-relevant-by-ambushing-oreillys-ambusher/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fox haters]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gawker ambushes watters]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jesse watters]]></category> <category><![CDATA[liberal bloggers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[oreilly ambushes]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotjoints.com/2009/06/23/gawker-pretends-to-be-relevant-by-ambushing-oreillys-ambusher/</guid> <description><![CDATA[For the last couple of months Gawker.com has been obsessed with Bill O’Reilly’s ambush interviews. O’Reilly likes to send one of his producers to confront cowardly public officials and left-wing journalists who refuse to appear on his show when they do outrageous things. O’Reilly’s chief ambusher is Fox producer Jesse Watters. Watters has confronted all [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>For the last couple of months Gawker.com has been obsessed with Bill O’Reilly’s ambush interviews.</p><p>O’Reilly likes to send one of his producers to confront cowardly public officials and left-wing journalists who refuse to appear on his show when they do outrageous things.</p><p>O’Reilly’s chief ambusher is Fox producer Jesse Watters. Watters has confronted all manner of people from judges to bloggers and everyone in between.</p><p>The idiots at Gawker decided to strike back at Watters and <a href="http://gawker.com/5299139/gawker-says-hi-to-fox-news-stalker-he-drives-away-like-a-coward" target="_blank">confront him</a> at his home at 6 a.m. as he was leaving with his wife.</p><p>Watters simply smiled and got into his car and drove away. I’m guessing the douchebags at Gawker expected to feel some kind of sweet vindication by ambushing Watters, but the whole thing turned out pretty lame.</p><p>Gawker claims to have spent <a href="http://gawker.com/5225016/ambushing-bill-oreillys-ambusher" target="_blank">two months</a> trying to ambush Watters, and this pathetic display is all they got out of it.</p><p>Next time you read about Gawker laying off some bloggers, it’ll be because they pissed away so much money on stunts like this.</p><p>Gawker’s hatred of Fox News and absolute devotion to Barack Obama has led the once semi-entertaining blog to become a gruesome left-wing tabloid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2009/06/23/gawker-pretends-to-be-relevant-by-ambushing-oreillys-ambusher/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Gawker Attacks The Fox Flack</title><link>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/07/08/gawker-attacks-the-fox-flack/</link> <comments>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/07/08/gawker-attacks-the-fox-flack/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:39:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chris Jones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fnc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category> <category><![CDATA[irena briganti]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Smears]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotjoints.com/?p=3935</guid> <description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t have a chance to read Gawker&#8217;s response yesterday to the NY Time&#8217;s latest Fox News hit piece, because I was busy writing my own response. Several bloggers e-mailed me the link to Gawker&#8217;s article and many of them were quite incredulous that I had not read it. They were right, I should have [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I didn&#8217;t have a chance to read Gawker&#8217;s response yesterday to the NY Time&#8217;s latest Fox News hit piece, because I was busy writing <a href="http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/07/07/ny-times-writes-hit-piece-about-fox-news-defending-itself-from-hit-pieces/" target="_blank">my own response</a>.</p><p>Several bloggers e-mailed me the link to <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/irena-briganti/?i=5022476&amp;t=irena-briganti-the-most-vindictive-flack-who-will-ever-yell-at-you" target="_blank">Gawker&#8217;s article</a> and many of them were quite incredulous that I had not read it. They were right, I should have read it. While the underlying premise of the piece is totally wrong, it&#8217;s a very entertaining article and I laughed my a*s off while reading it.</p><p>Gawker trains its sites on chief FNC flack, Irena Briganti, who Gawker labels &#8220;a mouthpiece of Fox boss Roger Ailes.&#8221; Her official title is Vice President of media relations.</p><p>According to Gawker and testimony from a terribly frightened news media, Irena wields a &#8220;bloody hatchet&#8221; the likes of which the world has never seen&#8211;not even Gawker.</p><p>The notorious gossip site goes on to list some of her most offensive and unfair statements over the years to those who&#8217;ve dared to criticize Fox.</p><p>Here&#8217;s the list of her &#8220;all time hits&#8221;as Gawker calls them:</p><ul><li><em>When Anderson Cooper chided Fox for running with a false report of Obama going to a Muslim school, Briganti <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/24/us/politics/24obama.html?ex=1170392400&amp;en=cf55c11d94c91332&amp;ei=5070">responded wit</a>h, &#8220;Yet another cry for attention by the Paris Hilton of television news, Anderson Cooper.”</em></li><li><em>Briganti <a href="http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2006/07/12/olbermann-puts-briganti-on-worst-person-in-the-world-list/">attributed </a>Keith Olbermann&#8217;s attacks on Bill O&#8217;Reilly to his &#8220;personal demons, and said &#8220;In the meantime, we hope he enjoys his paranoid view from the bottom of the ratings ladder and wish him well on his inevitable trip to oblivion.”</em></li><li><em>When Christiane Amanpour said CNN and Fox were intimidated by the Bush administration and practiced self-censorship in the run-up to the Iraq war, Briganti <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2003-09-14-media-mix_x.htm">responded</a>, &#8220;Given the choice, it&#8217;s better to be viewed as a foot soldier for Bush than a spokeswoman for al-Qaeda.&#8221;</em></li></ul><p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve laughed that hard in a while. Those are so good, that frankly, someone have them bronzed and placed in the lobby at Fox. You just don&#8217;t hear zingers that good everyday. Clearly, Irena Briganti can pretty well neuter any FNC critic with a single sentence.</p><p>The guy who wrote the Gawker piece is named <a href="http://gawker.com/people/Hamilton_Nolan/posts/" target="_blank">Hamilton Nolan</a> and he used to write for <em>PR Week</em>. He admits that he&#8217;s still bitter about his failed attempt to write a profile of Briganti a couple of years ago. He tried to get quotes from people who&#8217;d previosly been carved up by Briganti, but most were too fearful to talk. Incredibly, one person he asked immediately called Briganti and told her about the article he was writing.</p><p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>When I worked at <em>PRWeek </em>a couple of years ago, I tried to write a profile of Briganti. This, after several people who had dealt with her assured me that she was the single meanest flack in the entire media world (which is true). I sent emails out to a list of people in the media that Briganti had publicly insulted. And what happened? Some turned me down, citing fear of her. Some didn&#8217;t respond, out of fear. And one, in what I still consider to be the biggest bitch move I ever saw as a reporter, <em>ran straight to Irena</em>, telling her that a <em>PRWeek </em>reporter was out to smear her. This—from a reporter who had already been publicly smeared by Briganti—is akin to the kid whose response to being bullied is to grovel and try to please the bully further. </em></p><p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Briganti expertly strung me along for months, promising interviews in the near future and then pushing back the date continuously. Eventually the profile fell apart and never got written. She&#8217;s good at what she does. She is still quite willing to offer negative tidbits about her competitors to this day.</em></p><p>I recommend everyone read <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/irena-briganti/?i=5022476&amp;t=irena-briganti-the-most-vindictive-flack-who-will-ever-yell-at-you" target="_blank">the entire Gawker piece</a> as it&#8217;s quite entertaining. I think the bottom line here is that Irena Briganti is the best PR Flack in the business and it irritates the hell out of everyone that she works at Fox. If you look closely you&#8217;ll notice a trend when it comes to Fox News. They tend to have the best of everything. The best news coverage, the best anchors, the best ratings, and of course the best PR department. Oh yeah, they also have the best Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8211;sorry MSNBC.</p><p>The media becomes more dishonest and corrupt with every passing year, and trying to damage Fox News has practically become an Olympic sport. Kudos to Roger Ailes for having the right good sense to hire someone who doesn&#8217;t take any sh*t.</p><p>The liberal media is about as vicious a beast as anything you&#8217;re likely to come across in life. They love personal attacks and they don&#8217;t take prisoners. Which is why I find it particularly amusing that a lone Fox News flack has &#8220;got&#8217;em on the run,&#8221; to borrow a line from the President.</p><p>If anything, Irena deserves a raise.</p><p><em>-Chris Jones</em></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/07/08/gawker-attacks-the-fox-flack/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <!-- google_ad_section_end --></channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 3/21 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 559/606 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.thehotjoints.com @ 2012-02-09 17:42:21 -->
